Drawing for ATKINS CRUNCHABLES

USPTO serial 78459732

ATKINS CRUNCHABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATKINS CRUNCHABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. DeMaro

JOHN A DEMARO RUSKIN MOSCOU FALTISCHEK PC190 EAB PLZ FL TWR 15UNIONDALE, NY 11556-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pretzels, soy-based chips, crackers, popcorn, tortilla chips, taco chips, cheese flavored snacks in the nature of cheese puffs and cheese flavored chips, puffed corn snacks, cookies, cheese curls and soy crispsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 29, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance