Drawing for BRING JOBS HOME AMERICA

USPTO serial 78459780

BRING JOBS HOME AMERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRING JOBS HOME AMERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Bennett Perkins

KATHRYN BENNETT PERKINS ROSE LAW FIRMP.O. Box 4800Fayetteville, AR 72702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008hand tools, namely wrenchesACTIVE—
014jewelryACTIVE—
021containers for household and kitchen use not of metal, and household and kitchen utensils, namely, serving spoons, spatulas, and serving tongsACTIVE—
025shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance