Drawing for PRIMESCAN

USPTO serial 78459850

PRIMESCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMESCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew H. Simpson

ANDREW H SIMPSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES, NAMELY, ROLLS FOR GUIDING THE WEB MOUNTED ON A FRAME AND MOVEABLE BY ELECTRIC OR HYDRAULIC POWER; PACKAGING MACHINES; WEB CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, WEB GUIDES, WEB REWINDING AND TENSIONING MACHINERY AND WEB COMPENSATORS FOR CONTROLLING REGISTRATION IN PRINTING PROCEDURESACTIVE—
009MEASURING, SIGNALLING AND CONTROLLING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE OBSERVATION OF WEBS OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL, NAMELY, SCANNERS, VIDEO CAMERAS, LINE CHIP CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS, OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSORS; VIDEO INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR MONITORING PRINT QUALITY, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; APPARATUS FOR REGISTER MEASUREMENT AND REGISTER ADJUSTMENT OF PRINTING MACHINES, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; APPARATUS FOR COLOR MEASUREMENT OF PRINTS ON WEBS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; BARCODE READING APPARATUS; APPARATUS FOR RECOGNIZING PRINTING ERRORS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE FOR RECOGNIZING PRINTING ERRORS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING AND REPRODUCING IMAGES, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS, LASER PRINTERS, COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE; DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS, COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE OBSERVATION OF A WEB; WEB GUIDING APPARATUS, NAMELY, VIDEO AND LINE CHIP CAMERAS, OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSORS; WEB CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PRINTS ON WEBS; VIDEO WEB INSPECTION AND DEFECT DETECTION SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF VIDEO AND LINE CHIP CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS AND OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSOR FOR INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance