USPTO serial 78459850
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew H. Simpson
ANDREW H SIMPSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES, NAMELY, ROLLS FOR GUIDING THE WEB MOUNTED ON A FRAME AND MOVEABLE BY ELECTRIC OR HYDRAULIC POWER; PACKAGING MACHINES; WEB CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, WEB GUIDES, WEB REWINDING AND TENSIONING MACHINERY AND WEB COMPENSATORS FOR CONTROLLING REGISTRATION IN PRINTING PROCEDURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | MEASURING, SIGNALLING AND CONTROLLING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE OBSERVATION OF WEBS OF DIFFERENT MATERIAL, NAMELY, SCANNERS, VIDEO CAMERAS, LINE CHIP CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS, OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSORS; VIDEO INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR MONITORING PRINT QUALITY, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; APPARATUS FOR REGISTER MEASUREMENT AND REGISTER ADJUSTMENT OF PRINTING MACHINES, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; APPARATUS FOR COLOR MEASUREMENT OF PRINTS ON WEBS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS; BARCODE READING APPARATUS; APPARATUS FOR RECOGNIZING PRINTING ERRORS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE FOR RECOGNIZING PRINTING ERRORS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING AND REPRODUCING IMAGES, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS, LASER PRINTERS, COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE; DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS, COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE OBSERVATION OF A WEB; WEB GUIDING APPARATUS, NAMELY, VIDEO AND LINE CHIP CAMERAS, OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSORS; WEB CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING PRINTS ON WEBS; VIDEO WEB INSPECTION AND DEFECT DETECTION SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF VIDEO AND LINE CHIP CAMERAS, VIDEO MONITORS AND OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL SENSOR FOR INDUSTRIAL INSPECTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |