USPTO serial 78459952
ONENOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONENOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for networking, data synchronization, mobile computing and data sharing; computer software which allows users to synchronize, access, transfer, share and manage digital information and files across the Internet and other networks and with or between computers, consumer electronics, cell phones, PIMs, PDAs and mobile devices; computer software to synchronize, access, transfer, share and manage music, photos, videos, address books, calendars, e-mail, PIM data, PDA data, office and personal documents and streamed information from home electronics and appliances; computer software which allows users to manage information on home appliances, remotely check status, change and confirm programmed settings, and access and manage data stored thereon; computer software for synchronizing data between diverse devices; computer software for managing cell phones, PDA's and other mobile computing devices and for exchanging and synchronizing data between diverse mobile and stationary devices; computer software to allow secure data access and transfer across the Internet and other networks and between computers and devices; computer software for synchronization, data sharing, web publishing, remote control of cell phones, PDA's, portable computers, laptop computers and handheld digital computers; computer software for providing electronic messages to advise of various informational and environmental conditions; computer software for web and personal data searching; computer software for data and file backup and storage, and for duplicate file management across multiple devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Computer, computer software, networking, data synchronization and data sharing education training; education services and training seminars, courses and classes in the fields of computers, computer software, networking, data synchronization, mobile computing and data sharing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the fields of computers, computer software, networking, data synchronization, mobile computing and data sharing; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware, software, networking, data synchronization, mobile computing and data sharing; updating of computer software for others; computer software design and custom software design and implementation services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLISYNC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLISYNC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONENOC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |