USPTO serial 78460073
PRINTGATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALL, MICHAEL E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRINTGATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PRINT JOB TRACKING, AUDITING AND COST RECOVERY, AND NETWORK PRINTER IDENTIFICATION | ACTIVE | Apr 2, 2004 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR ORGANIZING, MANAGING, STORING, TRACKING, ANALYZING AND CREATING REPORTS ON INFORMATION RELATED TO PRINTER AND PRINT JOB MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING, DEVELOPING, IMPLEMENTING, INSTALLING, MAINTAINING, UPGRADING, SUPPORTING AND CONFIGURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND CONSULTING RELATED THERETO; PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION REGARDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND SERVICES; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR LOCALLY INSTALLED SOFTWARE TO COMMUNICATE WITH ONLINE SOFTWARE FOR PURPOSES OF BILLING, REPORTING AND OTHER COMPUTER SERVICES | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |