USPTO serial 78460348
SCREENLIFE STUDIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCREENLIFE STUDIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary S. Kindness
Gary S. Kindness Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC1420 Fifth AvenueSuite 2800Seattle, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programs, computer game software, video game programs, video game software, pre-recorded digital video discs featuring video clips on a wide variety of subjects; game equipment, namely, pre-recorded digital video discs featuring video clips on a wide variety of subjects | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Equipment sold as a unit for playing a board or parlor game | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Production of television shows, providing an online computer game, and entertainment in the nature of television game show series | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Screenlife, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Screenlife, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SCREENLIFE STUDIOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |