USPTO serial 78460516
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEYPO BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Entertainment services, namely radio broadcasting services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |