USPTO serial 78460537
OPTIVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric K. Chen
ERIC K CHEN LAW OFFICES OF ERIC K CHEN18725 GALE AVE STE 228CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748-1367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LCD television monitors; LCD Panels; LCD Large Screen Displays; TV and Video converters; Audio and Video equipment, namely, audio and video signal input and output interfaces; Audio and Video equipment for vehicles, namely, amplifiers, equalizers, crossovers, cable, and television monitor housings; DVD Players | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |