USPTO serial 78460968
DESIGN BENEFITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGN BENEFITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Coeur d' Alene, ID
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Services rendered in financial and monetary affairs and services rendered in relation to insurance contracts of all kinds, namely, MAJOR MEDICAL PLANS, SHORT AND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLANS, DENTAL, VISION, GROUP LIFE, VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PLANS, (i;e; Accidental Injury, Cancer,Hospital, ICU), RETIREMENT PLANNING, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMUNICATION (i;e; Personalized Benefit Statements, Employee Benefit Cost Summaries), BUY/SELL AGREEMENTS, ESTATE PLANNING SERVICES AND TRUST ARRANGEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |