Drawing for SIMPLICITY FOR CHILDREN

USPTO serial 78461568

SIMPLICITY FOR CHILDREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLICITY FOR CHILDREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NONE

RIC MILLER SFCA, INC.PO BOX 488BIRDSBORO, PA 19508-0488UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Infant furniture, especially cribs, beds, case furniture, changing tables, bouncing seats, playards and bassinets, and excluding home furnishings, adult mattresses and box springsACTIVEJan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 3, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 30, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 28, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 9, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance