USPTO serial 78461637
CLAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tao-Yuen Hsian, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig J.J. Snyder
CRAIG J J SNYDER CRAIG J J SNYDER PC67 WALL ST STE 2211NEW YORK, NY 10005-3101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric eggbeaters, can openers, salad blenders, clothes washers for domestic use, whizzers, dish washers for domestic use, juicers, squeezers, rice washers, vegetable washers, sonic cleaners, food processors for domestic use, clothes washers for commercial use and dish washers for commercial use; computer keyboards, computer diskette drives, CD-ROM drives, CD recorders, disc recorders, disc copiers, mouse pads, computer interface boards, microchip processors, computer interface boards for local and world wide networks, computer software for language translation, electronic translators, personal digital assistants, computer memory cards, carrying cases for computers, blank CD-R and CD-RW discs; video cassette recorders, video cassette players, combination video cassette/laser disk/DVD players and recorders, video/audio laser diskette players and recorders, digital video/audio laser diskette players and recorders, televisions, projector televisions, high density televisions, plasma televisions, television magnifying screens, television monitor display filters, television speakers, television projectors, liquid crystal displays for television sets, stereo sets, earphones, audio loudspeakers, automobile audio loudspeakers, sound amplifers, CD players and portable personal stereo sets; electric crock pots, electric frying pans, electric woks, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, refrigerators, freezers and electric clothes dryers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |