USPTO serial 78461655
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold S. Weintraub
ARNOLD S. WEINTRAUB THE WEINTRAUB GROUP32000 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 240FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334-1569UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data in the nature of a machine readable code representing a transaction receipt which is displayed on a mobile device display screen | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |