USPTO serial 78461665
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lake Orion, MI
CINCINNATI, OH
CINCINNATI, OH
Lake Orion, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold S. Weintraub
ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB THE WEINTRAUB GROUP32000 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 240FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334-1569UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data in the nature of a machine readable codes representing a transaction receipt which is displayed on a mobile device display screen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 4, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |