USPTO serial 78461678
ABANTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABANTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thad N. Leach
THAD N LEACH LEWIS RICE & FINGERSH LC500 N BROADWAY STE 2000BOX IP DEPTST LOUIS, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Human resources consultation; employee benefit plan account auditing services; conducting business research and surveys for human resources and employee benefits purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Employee benefits consultation, namely, employee benefit plan analysis services; employee benefit plan administration services; providing financial information, namely, financial data reporting in the field of employee benefit plans; and financial analysis, namely benchmarking in the nature of measuring the financial performance of employee benefit plans | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2004 |
| 038 | Electronic data transmission for human resources and employee benefit professionals and employers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Compliance services, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with employee benefit laws and regulations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |