USPTO serial 78462033
ROSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3223809Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6370 Stans, CH
6370 Stans, CH
6370 Stans, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Butler, Esq.
JEFFREY M BUTLER ESQ KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices, namely, cameras, surveying machines, inertial measurement units and instruments, global positioning system, digital map generators for generating digital maps to determine the geographical coordinates of pipelines; utilizing marine, photo, movie, right-of-way, rescue, training, optical, survey, surveillance, scientific methods; Electrical, electronic, optical, and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, sensors, detectors, cameras and radio wave transmitters for the location of cleaning and inspection machines in a pipeline, in particular, by low-frequency signals or magnetic signals; Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, cameras, magnetic sensors, ultrasonic sensors, eddy current sensors, mechanical sensors, inertial measurement sensors to determine the geometry of pipelines; Electrical, electronic, optical and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, cameras, magnetic sensors, ultrasonic sensors, eddy current sensors, mechanical sensors, inertial measurement sensors for measuring the free span and change in the weight-lining of an off-shore pipeline; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, cameras, magnetic sensors, ultrasonic sensors, eddy current sensors, mechanical sensors, inertial measurement sensors for examining metal loss and cracks in pipelines, Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, cameras, magnetic sensors, ultrasonic sensors, eddy current sensors, mechanical sensors, inertial measurement sensors for the inspection and monitoring of storage tanks, in particular for inspection of the tank bottom and the outer tank shell; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical devices, namely, pigging apparatus, cameras, magnetic sensors, ultrasonic sensors, eddy current sensors, mechanical sensors, inertial measurement sensors for inspection of smaller diameter pipeline; Electrical, electronic, optical, magnetic, acoustic and mechanical apparatus for recording and playback of audio and visual information, in particular transmitted by or to a pipeline inspection device from the inside of the pipeline or the outside of the pipeline; microprocessors, microcontrollers, data-acquisition devices, and computers for detecting and evaluating the inspection data of pipelines as well as microprocessor, microcontroller data acquisition receivers and computer programs for this purpose, namely, software for evaluating inspection data of engineering structures, operating software therefore, and computer programs for evaluation of the inspection data of pipelines, and computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines; volatile and non-volatile data carriers in particular with data and sold together in as a unit with computer programs for evaluating the inspection data of pipelines and with computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |