Drawing for THE MIAMI

USPTO serial 78462168

THE MIAMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MIAMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Lee Fraley

R LEE FRALEY SNELL & WILMER400 E VAN BUREN ST STE 1000PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2269UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services, located within shopping arcades and alone, featuring a variety of goods, namely, general merchandise, souvenirs, novelty items, gift items, clothing, clothing accessories, jewelry, toys, sporting goods, stationery products, books, videos, fragrances, personal care products, cosmetics, house ware, art, foods, beverages, cigars, cigarettes, and smoking accessoriesACTIVE—
041Casino and gaming services; providing casino and gaming facilities; entertainment services, namely, live musical performances, theatrical productions and comedy productions; providing fitness and exercise consultation and instructional services and facilities; night clubs; amusement centers and arcades; figure salons; providing casino and gaming services by means of web sites and a global computer networkACTIVE—
043Hotel, restaurant, and bar services; hotel services for preferred customers; reservation of hotel rooms for travelers; catering services; providing facilities for conventions, banquets, social functions, fund raising, and special eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance