USPTO serial 78462368
FAMOSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAMOSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lawrenceville, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford, Esq.
ANN K FORD ESQ PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 19TH ST NW # 7WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning products for household and janitorial applications, namely, kitchen and bathroom cleaners, toilet cleaners, floor cleaners and polish, furniture cleaners and polish, tile and grout cleaners and bleaches, carpet cleaners, window cleaners, drain cleaners, septic system cleaners, oven cleaners and degreasers, general purpose cleaners, degreasers, cleaning wipes impregnated with chemicals, kitchen and bathroom sanitizers, toilet sanitizers, floor sanitizers, air fresheners, sanitizers and deodorizers, fabric deodorizing preparations, carpet sanitizers, drain sanitizers, septic system sanitizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |