USPTO serial 78462370
TMG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TMG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Des Moines, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY J. ZARLEY
TIMOTHY J ZARLEY ZARLEY LAW FIRM PLC400 LOCUST ST STE 200CAPITAL SQDES MOINES, IA 50309-2350Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services provided to credit unions, namely, credit, debit and ATM card processing,financial asset/liability management, automated financial clearinghouse services, share draft financial services and mortgage loan services | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 25, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |