USPTO serial 78463132
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, JACKETS, COATES, PULLOVERS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, JEANS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, PANTS, JERSEYS, JUMPERS, WAISTCOATS, BLOUSES, SLEEPWEAR, NAMELY, PAJAMA SUITS, NIGHT SHIRTS, NIGHT DRESSES, DRESSING ROBES, UNDERWEAR, BOXER SHORTS, BRIEFS, BRAS, LINGERIE, GARTERS, HOSIERY, CORSETS, BODICES; CLOTHES FOR BABIES, NAMELY, ROMPER SUITS AND BIBS NOT OF PAPER; CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, JACKETS, TIES, BOW TIES, PULLOVERS, TROUSERS, SOCKS, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, PANTS, JERSEYS, JUMPERS, WAISTCOATS, SLEEPWEAR, NAMELY, PAJAMA SUITS, NIGHT SHIRTS, NIGHT DRESSES, DRESSING ROBES FOR CHILDREN AND FOR BABIES; OUTER CLOTHING, NAMELY, BLAZERS, COATS, FLEECE PULLOVERS, PADDED JACKETS; SPORTS CLOTHING, NAMELY TRACK SUITS, TRAINING SUITS, LEOTARDS, BATHING SUITS, BIKINIS, SWIMMING TRUNKS, BEACHWEAR, SPORTS BRAS, JOCK STRAPS; SPORTS CLOTHING FOR CHILDREN AND FOR BABIES, NAMELY, TRACK SUITS, TRAINING SUITS, LEOTARDS, BATHING SUITS, BIKINIS, SWIMMING TRUNKS, BEACHWEAR FOR CHILDREN AND FOR BABIES; BOW TIES, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, MONEY BELTS, GLOVES, MITTENS SOCKS AND SCARVES; GLOVES, MITTENS, SOCKS AND SCARVES FOR CHILDREN AND FOR BABIES; HEADWEAR AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |