CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IDAVIS

USPTO serial 78463282

IDAVIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDAVIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Multi screen system comprised of plural plasma display panels; apparatus for controlling and processing audio and video data used in the aforesaid system; computer software and programs for controlling and processing audio and video data in the aforesaid system; plasma display panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance