USPTO serial 78463509
NATIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3592954Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells, PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; dry broad beans; preserved peas; preserved vegetables, fruit pulps; preserved olives; frozen fruits and vegetables; processed edible seeds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 21, 2007 |
| 030 | Rice-based snack foods; toasted corn kernels; corn flakes; corn flour; edible flour; rice; processed oats; sauces; condiments, namely, bread; cookies; chocolate; pasta; spices; vanilla; cinnamon; sweets, namely, candies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Productos Nativo, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Productos Nativo, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Productos Nativo, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NATIVO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |