USPTO serial 78463516
SHELVING BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHELVING BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dickson M. Lupo
Dickson M. Lupo Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | BICYCLE STORAGE RACKS OF METAL; METAL BASKETS, METAL TELEVISION WALL MOUNTS; METAL STORAGE UNITS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; METAL STACKABLE STORAGE UNITS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; METAL HOUSEHOLD AND GARAGE STORAGE CELLS AND CONTAINERS AND METAL STORAGE HARDWARE THEREOF, NAMELY, WHEELS, MOUNTING RACKS, RAILS, SLIDES, HOOKS, BRACKETS, WALL ANCHORS, SCREWS, FASTENERS, RODS AND CLIPS; METAL STORAGE HARDWARE KITS CONTAINING WHEELS, MOUNTING RACKS, RAILS, SLIDES, HOOKS, BRACKETS, WALL ANCHORS, SCREWS, FASTENERS, RODS AND CLIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | ADHESIVE AND NON-ADHESIVE SHELVING AND DRAWER LINERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | SHELVES MADE OF CANVAS FOR USE IN CLOSETS; STORAGE BOXES MADE OF CANVAS FOR USE IN CLOSETS; METAL STORAGE RACKS; METAL GARMENT RACKS FOR HOUSEHOLD STORAGE; NON-METAL HOUSEHOLD AND GARAGE STORAGE SHELVES AND CONTAINERS AND METAL STORAGE HARDWARE THEREOF, NAMELY, WHEELS, MOUNTING RACKS, RAILS, SLIDES, HOOKS, BRACKETS, WALL ANCHORS, SCREWS, FASTENERS, RODS AND CLIPS ALL SOLD AS A UNIT; NON-METAL STORAGE RACKS, NON-METAL STORAGE HARDWARE, NAMELY, WHEELS, MOUNTING RACKS, RAILS, SLIDES, HOOKS, BRACKETS, WALL ANCHORS, SCREWS, FASTENERS, RODS AND CLIPS; NON-METAL TELEVISION WALL MOUNTS AND GARMENT RACKS FOR HOUSEHOLD STORAGE; HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE AND FURNISHINGS, NAMELY, BATHROOM, KITCHEN, CLOSET AND GARAGE ORGANIZERS, SHELVES, WIRE SHELVES, FREE-STANDING SHELF ORGANIZERS, STORAGE RACKS, DISPLAY RACKS, COAT RACKS, BOOKSHELVES, DRAWER AND SHELF ORGANIZERS; NON-METAL STORAGE BOXES; NON-METAL STORAGE UNITS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; NON-METAL STACKABLE STORAGE UNITS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; BATHROOM FURNITURE, NAMELY, VANITIES, MEDICINE CABINETS, CORNER SHELF UNITS, BATH ETAGERES; BATHROOM STORAGE FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | NON-METAL PLANT BASKETS; BASKETS MADE OF WICKER, WOOD, STRAW, CANVAS, CLOTH AND BAMBOO FOR STORAGE PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | CLOSET ACCESSORIES AND ORGANIZERS, NAMELY, SHELF COVERS MADE OF CANVAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LF, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LF, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SHELVING BY DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |