USPTO serial 78463601
RORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bret J. Danow
Bret J. Danow Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 Madison AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | APPAREL, NAMELY WOMEN'S HIGH FASHION DESIGN BLOUSES, SKIRTS AND SUITS; WOMEN'S BLAZERS, JACKETS, SKIRTS, PANTS, DRESSES, SUITS, SWEATERS, JUMPSUITS, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, COATS, VESTS, BUSTIERS, BELTS, RAINCOATS, JEANS, BODYSUITS AND T-SHIRTS; LINGERIE, SOCKS, LEGGINGS, CAPRI PANTS, OVER-COATS AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY DRESSES, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, BLAZERS, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, OVERALLS, BELTS AND SOCKS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS; HEADGEAR, NAMELY HATS, BERETS, SKI HATS and CAPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |