USPTO serial 78464032
Serial No. 78464032
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3604278Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 78464032?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean W. Dwyer
Sean W. Dwyer QVC, Inc.1200 Wilson DriveMail Code 207West Chester, PA 19380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | KITCHEN PRODUCTS, NAMELY, JUICE MACHINES, ELECTRICAL PASTA MAKERS FOR DOMESTIC USE AND ELECTRICAL FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC MIXERS, ELECTRIC BLENDERS, ELECTRIC HAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC STAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC ICE CRUSHERS, ELECTRIC ICE SHAVERS, ELECTRIC FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PEELERS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS AND VACUUM PACKAGING MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
| 008 | NON-ELECTRICAL PASTA MAKERS, FOOD PROCESSORS AND MIXERS, FOR DOMESTIC USE, CUTLERY, TABLEWARE, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS AND STAINLESS STEEL AND POLYURETHANE/PLASTIC SPOONS, FORKS AND KNIVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
| 011 | ELECTRICAL SKILLETS, ELECTRIC ROTISSERIES, BREAD MACHINES; ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS, ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS, BARBECUE GRILLS, ELECTRIC TOASTERS, ELECTRIC TOASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, ELECTRIC SLOW-COOK CASSEROLES, ELECTRIC WOKS, ELECTRIC FRYING PANS, ELECTRIC GRILLS, ELECTRIC GRIDDLES, OUTDOOR ELECTRIC GRILLS, SMOKELESS BARBECUE GRILLS, CONVECTION OVENS FOR DOMESTIC USE, MICROWAVE OVENS FOR COOKING, ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS, ELECTRONIC ROASTERS, ELECTRIC RICE COOKERS AND ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMERS, ELECTRIC AND MANUAL ICE CREAM MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
| 021 | STAINLESS STEEL NON-STICK COOKWARE, STAINLESS STEEL COOKWARE, ALUMINUM ENAMEL COATED NON-STICK COOKWARE AND ANODIZED ALUMINUM COOKWARE ALL COMPOSED OF POTS, PANS, SAUTE PANS, FRY PANS, STOCK POTS, SAUCE PANS, WOKS, COLANDERS, NON-ELECTRICAL FOOD STEAMERS, STOVE TOP GRILLS AND GRIDDLES, STAINLESS STEEL AND ALUMINUM BAKEWARE, NAMELY, COOKIE SHEETS, CAKE PANS, MUFFIN AND PIE PANS, LOAF PANS, ROAST PANS, PIZZA PANS AND EXPANDABLE CAKE PANS, TEA KETTLES, WOK, FRY PANS, ICE CREAM SCOOPS, GARLIC PRESS, STAINLESS STEEL AND POLYURETHANE/PLASTIC KITCHEN UTENSILS, NAMELY, SPATULAS, WHISKS, TONGS AND LADLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IC Marks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by QVC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QVC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QVC, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 21, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |