USPTO serial 78464183
ROSEN PAMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSEN PAMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6370 Stans, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Butler, Esq.
JEFFREY M BUTLER ESQ KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | "Apparatuses and instruments for shipping, photography, filming, weighing, rescue and instruction, scientific, optical, surveying, measuring apparatuses and instruments,signal and control apparatuses and instruments in particular for determining the geographical coordinates of a pipeline; devices and apparatuses for the location of cleaning and inspection machines in a pipeline, in particular by low-frequency signals or by magnetic signals; devices and apparatuses for determining the geometry of pipelines of all types; devices and apparatuses for measuring the free span and the change in the weight-lining of an off-shore pipeline; devices and apparatuses for detecting and calculating deposit quantities in pipelines; devices and apparatuses for examining metal loss in pipelines, in particular on the inner and outer pipe walls; devices and apparatuses for monitoring tanks, in particular for inspecting the tank bottom and the perpendicular tank walls; devices and apparatuses for inspecting pipelines having smaller diameters, in particular high-pressure steel pipes; devices for recording and playback of sound and picture, in particular devices and apparatuses for transmitting detected pipeline data; data-processing devices and computers for detecting and for evaluating the inspection data of pipelines of all types, as well as computer programs for this purpose and computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines of all types; data carriers, in particular with data and with computer programs for evaluating the inspection data of pipelines of all types, as well as computer programs for storing and administering the inspection data of pipelines of all types;" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |