USPTO serial 78464200
IQ COUPLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IQ COUPLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Schumann
MICHAEL D SCHUMANN MERCHANT & GOULDPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal couplings with integrated electronic sensors for measuring the characteristics of material transferred through the coupling for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; metal couplings with integrated electronic sensors for identifying the device to which the coupling is coupled for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; metal couplings with integrated computer chipset for use in automatically storing electronic data about the coupling, material transferred through the coupling, and the device to which the coupling is coupled for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; metal couplings with integrated computer chipset for use in automatically transmitting electronic data about the coupling, material transferred through the coupling, and the device to which the coupling is coupled to and from a central processing unit for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal couplings with integrated electronic sensors for measuring the characteristics of material transferred through the coupling for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; non-metal couplings with integrated electronic sensors for identifying the device to which the coupling is coupled for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; non-metal couplings with integrated computer chipset for use in automatically storing electronic data about the coupling, material transferred through the coupling, and the device to which the coupling is coupled for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses; non-metal couplings with integrated computer chipset for use in automatically transmitting electronic data about the coupling, material transferred through the coupling, and the device to which the coupling is coupled to and from a central processing unit for use with non-metal, plastic and rubber hoses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |