USPTO serial 78464208
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ira D. Wincott
IRA D WINCOTT LAW OFFICE OF IRA D WINCOTT ESQ166 E JERICHO TPKEMINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper Goods and Printed Matters, namely, address books, label paper, paper labels, engraving plates, addressing machines, adhesive tape dispensers, coin and photograph albums, blank cards and greeting cards, air stones, art etchings, mounts, paper, pictures, prints and reproductions; autograph books, microwave cooking bags, binders, boxes, calendars, printed charts, flip charts, clip boards; coin mats and wrappers; crayons, credit cards without magnetic coding, crossword puzzles, decals, paper party decorations; desk accessories, namely, desk blotters , desk calendars, desk file trays, desk pads, desk sets, desk stands and holders for pens and pencils and ink; paper emblems; file boxes, cards, folders; paper jackets, pockets for storage of business or personal record; paper flags, folders, printed forms, garbage bags, gift cards, wrapping paper and paper ribbons, grocery bags, paper hats, magazine columns all on labor union issues; magnetic boards and paper, masking paper, mat boards, postcards, rulers, plastic sandwich bags, stationery, paper table cloths, paper napkins, tissues, toilet paper. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |