USPTO serial 78464437
PANTERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANTERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN NICOLAS DE LOS GARZA, N.L., MX
SAN NICOLAS DE LOS GARZA, N.L., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT AND JEREMY CRAFT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Building materials of metal, namely, metal building panels, metal roofing, metal roofing tiles, metal decking, metal ceiling panels, metal floor tiles, metal door and window frames and casings, metal boards for flooring, metal girders and joists; metal load bearing constructions, namely, framework of metal for buildings, reinforcing materials of metal for buildings in the form of metal bars, metal fastening bolts and metal rods; building boards of metal, building panels of metal, building linings of metal, and building wall cladding of metal; steel, unwrought and partly wrought common metals and their alloys and steels in the form of strips, hoops, coils, sheets, tubes and plates; rolled steel sheets, coated steel sheets, aluminized steel sheets, and galvanized steel sheets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |