Drawing for WATCHTHEGUYS

USPTO serial 78464483

WATCHTHEGUYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATCHTHEGUYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SEYAMACK KOURETCHIAN

SEYAMACK KOURETCHIAN COAST LAW GROUP LLP169 SAXONY RD STE 204ENCINITAS, CA 92024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded media, namely, video tapes, video cassettes, DVDs and CD-ROMs featuring information on reality based programsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts and baseball capsACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely streaming of audio, video, and audio/video content via the Internet; electronic delivery of images, photographs, voice and text via the InternetACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going, reality-based program featuring two roommates and their circle of friends, namely providing a subscription website featuring images, articles and video footageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2005GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance