USPTO serial 78464623
WITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Hantman, Esq.
ROBERT J HANTMAN ESQ HANTMAN & ASSOCIATES432 PARK AVE S FL 2NEW YORK, NY 10016-8013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, COATS, RAINCOATS, ANORAKS, PARKAS, BLAZERS, JACKETS, CARDIGANS, BOLEROS, SPORT COATS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, SUITS, DRESSES, GOWNS, JUMPERS, SKIRTS, PANTS, SLACKS, TROUSERS, JEANS, DUNGAREES, JUMPSUITS, OVERALLS, COVERALLS, FLIGHT SUITS, GYM SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEAT PANTS, THERMAL UNDERWEAR, SHORTS, SKORTS, ROMPERS, CULOTTES, SHORTALLS, SHIRTS, SWEATERS, JERSEYS, BLOUSES, TUNICS, SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, HALTER TOPS, TANK TOPS, BODYSUITS, UNITARDS, CAMISOLES, CHEMISES, UNDERSHIRTS, SLIPS, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, BODYSHAPERS, BRASSIERES, BUSTIERS, GARTER BELTS, BRIEFS, BOXER SHORTS, BLOOMERS, UNDERPANTS, PANTIES, LINGERIE, LOUNGEWEAR, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHT SHIRTS, NEGLIGEES, ROBES, PAJAMAS, HOSIERY, PANTYHOSE, TIGHTS, KNEE HIGHS, LEG WARMERS, LEGGINGS, SOCKS, HEAD WEAR, HATS, CAPS, HOODS, HEAD BANDS, NECKTIES, GLOVES, MITTENS, BELTS, SASHES, SHOES, FOOTWEAR, BOOTS, ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, GALOSHES, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, BEACHWEAR, BEACH COVERUPS, SARONGS, SKI WEAR, SKI SUITS, SKI PANTS, SKI GLOVES, THERMAL SOCKS, and PLAYSUITS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |