USPTO serial 78464639
THR RIGHT PARTNER. THE RIGHT SOLUTION.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THR RIGHT PARTNER. THE RIGHT SOLUTION.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. DeVoe
DANIEL J DEVOE NCS PEARSON INC5601 GREEN VALLEY DRBLOOMINGTON, MN 55437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for assisting educators, school administrators, students and parents of students in administrative and record-keeping tasks, information management, database searching and administration, and reporting of data and information on computers and computer networks in the field of education and user guides and manuals sold as a unit therewith; database management software for general use by assisting educators, school administrators, students and parents of students in administrative and record-keeping tasks, information management, database searching and administration, and reporting of data and information on computers and computer networks in the field of education and user guides and manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |