Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78464902?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78464902. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78464902, the listed owner(s) include: Specialty Process Fabricators, Inc., Specialty Process Fabricators, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78464902?

Serial number 78464902 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY?

SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY (78464902) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY?

The public record lists International Classes: 040, 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY Serial# 78464902 | status 601; last event MAB1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle T. Peterson

KYLE T PETERSON PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN4800 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
040	CUSTOM FABRICATION OF PROCESS MODULES, LUBRICATION SYSTEMS, TANKS, VESSELS, PRESSURE VESSELS, COMPRESSOR PACKAGES, AUXILIARY SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT BASES AND ASSEMBLIES, HEAT EXCHANGERS, THERMAL CONTROLLERS, PROCESS TRAIN EQUIPMENT, FUEL GAS CONDITIONING SYSTEMS, GENERAL MODULES, HYDRAULIC CONTROL MODULES AND PANELS, FILTRATION AND SEPARATION SYSTEMS, FOR THE PETROCHEMICAL, GAS PRODUCTION, GAS TRANSMISSION, PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRIES	ACTIVE	Oct 20, 2006
042	ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE PETROCHEMICAL, GAS PRODUCTION, GAS TRANSMISSION, PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRIES	ACTIVE	Oct 20, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
May 22, 2007	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
May 22, 2007	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
May 22, 2007	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Dec 27, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2006	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Oct 27, 2006	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Oct 27, 2006	EISU	TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED	The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 21, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Sep 21, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Sep 21, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Nov 10, 2005	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Nov 4, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 2, 2005	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Nov 2, 2005	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Nov 2, 2005	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Oct 7, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 19, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 19, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 15, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 19, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

SF SPECFAB AN ERGON COMPANY