USPTO serial 78465201
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BUFFALO GROVE, IL
International Profit Associates, Inc.
Buffalo Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by International Profit Associates, Inc.
International Profit Associates, Inc.
Buffalo Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by International Profit Associates, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas G. de la Torre
Nicholas G. de la Torre BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation, namely, business consultation services, business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others, business management and consultation, business management planning, profit survey and analysis, business marketing consultation services, business organizational consultation, business planning, preparing business reports, providing business marketing information, business auditing, business acquisition and merger consultation, accounting services, and cost accounting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | [Financial consultation, namely, financial consultation services, financial analysis, financial management, financial planning, financial portfolio management, and financial research] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |