USPTO serial 78465242
INOVA SPORTSPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3588936Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INOVA SPORTSPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Inova Health System Foundation
Falls Church, VA
Inova Health System Foundation
Falls Church, VA
Inova Health System Foundation
Falls Church, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph M. Tener
Ralph M. Tener MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, P.C.11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and training services, namely, conducting training sessions and training programs, and conducting seminars, workshops, courses, and tutorials in the fields of preventing and recovering from sports-related injuries, athletic training, health, and sports; athletic training services for physical rehabilitation and injury prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
| 042 | Medical research services in the fields of sports medicine and sports-related injuries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
| 044 | Health care services, namely, physical therapy, health screening and assessment for sports-related injuries, prevention services for sports-related injuries, namely, physical therapy evaluation and treatment to stretch and strengthen muscles and to improve movements, prescription and monitoring of exercise programs for physical rehabilitation and injury prevention, occupational therapy health services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inova Health System Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Inova Health System Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Inova Health System Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named INOVA SPORTSPLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |