USPTO serial 78465269
TOMATICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMATICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
46360 Bunol, Valencia, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely, advertising and business advice relating to cultural activities and traditional Spanish festivals computerized file management, namely, compilation and systematic ordering of data on a central computer; word processing; sales promotion for others through the distribution and the administration of advertising material and merchandise; import and export agencies; business management; selling by electronic media, namely, online retail store services featuring clothing, dolls, and printed material; commercial retailing, namely, electronic retailing services via computer featuring clothing, dolls, and printed material; business administration and office work; organization and holding of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; rental of advertising space; business management advisory services; business management assistance; business information; conducting marketing studies; public relations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Party planning; amusement, namely, organizing traditional Spanish festivals and cultural events; training services in how to plan and organize cultural and folkloric festivals; and entertainment services, namely, entertainment in the nature of cultural fairs and traditional Spanish festivals; organizing Community sporting and cultural events; organizing exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; publication of books; publication of texts other than publicity texts; educational services, namely, arranging and conducting of colloquiums, competitions, conferences, congresses, seminars and symposiums in the field of cultural activities and traditional Spanish festivals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |