CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MAYRIG CUISINE TRADITIONELLE

USPTO serial 78465328

MAYRIG CUISINE TRADITIONELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAYRIG CUISINE TRADITIONELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Parounag Astourian

Parounag Astourian Law Offices of Paro Astourian3532 Milton StreetPasadena, CA 91107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely semi-cooked, prepared and packed entrees consisting primarily of meat, cheese, fish, poultry and vegetables; and preserved, dried and cooked vegetables and fruitsACTIVE—
043Restaurant services, namely, preparing and serving all kinds of foods and drinks for consumption on the premises, take out or deliveryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance