Drawing for I'M LIVIN' IT

USPTO serial 78465331

I'M LIVIN' IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I'M LIVIN' IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Broder

James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing online, non-downloadable educational information in the field of lifestyle management in the nature of fitness and exerciseABANDONEDJun 26, 2004
043Providing online, non-downloadable educational information in the field of food and beverage nutrition, healthy dining in the nature of menu item selection and lifestyle management in the nature of restaurant selectionABANDONEDJun 26, 2004
044Providing online, non-downloadable educational information in the field of healthy dining in the nature of diet and nutritionABANDONEDJun 26, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 5, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance