Drawing for 30 MINUTES VS. 30 SECONDS

USPTO serial 78465914

30 MINUTES VS. 30 SECONDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 30 MINUTES VS. 30 SECONDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerald E. Nagae, Reg. No. 29,418

KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035multimedia production, namely preparing and placing multimedia advertising for others; preparing print and audio and visual presentations for others for use in advertising and entertainment; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing advertisements in electronic magazines accessed through a global computer network; and business marketing consulting servicesACTIVE—
040color separation services, electronic digitizing of photographs into computer readable media; electronic imaging scanning, digitizing, alteration and retouching of artwork and photographic images and text materials; and video, post production services, namely color separation services and editing and duplication of videotapesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance