CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OXÓSSI

USPTO serial 78465943

OXÓSSI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OXÓSSI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Day

Christopher J. Day LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 EAST BETHANY HOME ROAD, SUITE A-213PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, BELTS, COATS, AND SWEATERS; HEADWEAR AND FOOTWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 19, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 14, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance