USPTO serial 78466211
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Strathroy, CA
Strathroy, CA
Strathroy, CA
VILLE ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
LACHINE, QUEBEC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Heinze
Christie Baty Heinze Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Paintballs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |