Drawing for PLASTIC DOBIE

USPTO serial 78466695

PLASTIC DOBIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLASTIC DOBIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Plastic construction elements used in the setting of newly poured concrete, namely, bar supports, duct supports, chairs, tubing, inserts, bolsters, caps, spacers, rebar covers, anchors, and sleevesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jun 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance