USPTO serial 78467111
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Cumbow
ROBERT C CUMBOW GRAHAM & DUNN PC2801 ALASKAN WAY STE 300SEATTLE, WA 98121-1128UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers, long distance telephone communication services, satellite communication services, wireless broadband communication services, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions, ISDN services, personal communication services, providing fiber optic network services, intercepting and preventing unsolicited calls from telemarketers, routing calls to local third-party taxi-cab dispatchers, telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; provision of telecommunications connections to a global computer networks, webcasting audio or visual programming via a global computer network, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; telecommunication gateway services; communication by computer terminals, communications by fiber optic networks, computer aided transmission of messages and images, facsimile transmission, message sending, paging services, data communication services by means of telephones, telegraphs, mobile phones, optical fibers, satellite, Internet and facsimiles; telephone services, namely, cellular, international, interstate, intrastate, local and long distance, prepaid long distance, conferencing, communication and voice messaging; telegraph services; telex services; telegraphic wire services; cable radio transmission; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; satellite communication services; electronic mail services; rental of telecommunication equipment, namely, telephones, facsimile machines; e-mail forwarding services; Web site forwarding services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; collection, transmission and delivery of mail message, telegrams, information and data by mechanical, electronic messaging, conferencing and order- transmission services; radio and television transmission services; radio and television broadcasting services; cable television broadcasting; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; provision of telecommunication access to coding and decoding software; preparation of reports in relation to telecommunication; providing online forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning music, business, telecommunications, Internet, advertising, sports, games, finance, investment, insurance, transportation, travel, education, technology, recreation, art and science; telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; providing access to, not content for, Internet computer information networks featuring digital music Web sites; electronic delivery of images, photographs and digital music via Internet; telecommunications consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |