Drawing for DR. DENTON

USPTO serial 78467246

DR. DENTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHELLA, MELISSA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. DENTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine S. Chang

KATHERINE S CHANG HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVE RM 4400NEW YORK, NY 10166-0091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body lotion, bath oil, bath beads, toilet soaps, bath soaps and cosmetic cases sold with cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 27, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance