Drawing for SIGNET

USPTO serial 78467319

SIGNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Milner, Esq.

ROBERT M MILNER ESQ ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE GENOVESE &1345 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 31NEW YORK, NY 10105-0302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal curtain rings and metal shower curtain ringsACTIVE—
020Non-metal shower curtain rings and non-metal hooksACTIVE—
021Soap dishes, tumblers, toothbrush holders, tissue holders, toilet paper holders, lotion dispensers, soap dispensers, canisters, and wastepaper basketsACTIVE—
024Comforters, duvet covers, coverlets, blankets, throws, bed sheets, bed sheet sets, bedskirts, pillows cases, shams, bath towels, hand towels, washcloths, shower curtains, shower curtain liners, curtains and fabric valancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 27, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 18, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance