Drawing for MULTIMEDIOS TELEVISION

USPTO serial 78467435

MULTIMEDIOS TELEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTIMEDIOS TELEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear, Esq.

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR ESQ KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, radio, internet, paging, cable television and television transmissionsACTIVE—
041Entertainment, namely, production of television shows, internet shows, and radio shows; On-line publication of newspapers and magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 19, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 15, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance