USPTO serial 78467532
DIOPSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIOPSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors and integrated circuits; circuit boards; prerecorded computer programs on storage media for programming of semiconductor integrated circuits; prerecorded computer programs for digital audio and sound processing; kits for developing, demonstrating and testing of semiconductor integrated circuits comprised of circuit boards, integrated circuits, CD ROMs, software, product and user instructions, product guides, electrical cables, and electrical connectors; digital consumer products, namely, digital cameras and camera modules, optical, photographic, audio and audio/visual consumer products; electrical connectors; electrical plugs; electrical cables. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |