Drawing for SAF-T-LID

USPTO serial 78467650

SAF-T-LID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAF-T-LID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Rogers

CHARLES J ROGERS CONLEY ROSE PC600 TRAVIS ST STE 7100HOUSTON, TX 77002-2912UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Toilet seat lid safety products, namely, toilet lids with integrated locking mechanisms used for securing toilet seat lids in the closed positionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 5, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Apr 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 24, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 24, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 25, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance