Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78467667?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78467667. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78467667, the listed owner(s) include: Bernhard, David, Gardner, Cheryl E..

What is USPTO serial number 78467667?

Serial number 78467667 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE?

EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE (78467667) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE?

The public record lists International Classes: 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78467667

EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Aug 15, 2004
Status date: Jul 19, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY VIRGINIA DIVORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Bernhard, David
Falls Church, VA
Other trademarks owned by Bernhard, David
Gardner, Cheryl E.
Falls Church, VA
Other trademarks owned by Gardner, Cheryl E.

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
042	Legal Services	ACTIVE	Apr 2, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 16, 2007	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Apr 16, 2007	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Jan 23, 2007	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Nov 21, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 14, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 14, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 5, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2005	GRML	CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED	—
Oct 12, 2005	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 27, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 21, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 21, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 1, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 1, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 24, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—