USPTO serial 78468014
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Highland Park, IL
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Young
SUSAN D WEIS HSN IMPROVEMENTS LLC1 HSN DRSAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33729UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order catalog services featuring yard and lawn decorations, outdoor furniture, outdoor appliances, pool accessories, home repair and maintenance items, products for entertainment and amusement, home accessories, indoor furniture, indoor lighting, indoor appliances, automotive products, electronics, products for media storage, personal hygiene products, therapeutic devices, garden products, pet care products, and items for pest control; Computerized on-line retail store services featuring yard and lawn decorations, outdoor furniture, outdoor appliances, pool accessories, home repair and maintenance items, products for entertainment and amusement, home accessories, indoor furniture, indoor lighting, indoor appliances, automotive products, electronics, products for media storage, personal hygiene products, therapeutic devices, garden products, pet care products, and items for pest control | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |