USPTO serial 78468016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTINE MARY MILLER
KRISTINE MARY MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80202-3921UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Market analysis services; consumer market information analysis services; investigation and planning of market strategies; brand creation services for others; brand marketing services for others; brand management services for others; brand development services for others; brand strategy services for others; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely workshops and seminars in the fields of brand creation and brand management and brand development and brand strategy; training services in the fields of brand creation and brand management and brand development and brand strategy; management training services; education services, namely workshops and seminars and training services relating to the education and motivation of employees; instructional services in the fields of brand creation and brand strategy and brand development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Graphic design of brands and information services relating thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |